

But he also has some of the expected features of a regular thriller hero: Joe is brave, steady, street- smart (or, in his case, trail-smart), uncompromising – which puts him at odds, from time to time, with his hierarchy and his political connections. And he has the rare ability to find himself right on the path of dangerous criminals of all kinds that chose the remote mountains of the Grand Teton Park to hide…2- The location.
For a European, Wyoming is the paragon of Western exoticism: its name evokes wilderness, endless mountain ranges, horseback riding, wolves and grizzly bears…It is also rural America, where hunting is part of your life, where most people vote Republican, where foreigners like me would be spotted immediately…yes, so although it would probably be quite uncomfortable for me to live in a town like Saddlestring, I liked a lot the background scenery of Box’s novels and the atmosphere resulting from the omnipresence of nature. I also have to say that, when it comes to nature, Box’s prose becomes almost poetical. He has some beautiful descriptions of the wilderness and of his hero’s’ close relationship to nature.
3- The topics.
And, because the hero is a game warden, you'll also learn a lot about the hunting and fishing legislation in Wyoming! (ok, it might not be so relevant to you, but you'll still read some nice pages about nature and wild animals)
Moreover, the familial and social background of the novels give you a good insight of the middle-class life today, in America. I really do think that critics tend to underestimate the importance of realism in crime novels. No need to read only Jonathan Franzen to learn about America today. Many crime novels also give you a fair reflection of the everyday life of the middle class.
5- The action.
You'll get plenty of it in these novels, although not the usual car chase: instead, expect snowshoes chases and horseback riding pursuits. And most of the action is assumed not only by Joe Pickett, but also by his Nemesis of a friend, the mysterious Nate Notalowski: he may be a former CIA agent turned mercenary and he is currently wanted by the FBI, which is why he is more or less always living clandestinely. The character itself is not that new: many crime novel heroes have a tough guy as a best friend without much principles doing the dirty work at their place. However, in this case, although not new, the character is an interesting one: Nate is a free-thinker, violent and sensible at the same time; he has freed himself from any social compromise and the Pickett family is almost his only contact with society (but he is also going to change, novel after novel). So, action scenes, especially when Nate gets involved, are very satisfying (especially when Nate crushes some stupid, ignorant and self-righteous guys...)
Not convinced yet? I can't say that, when reading one of the Joe Pickett's novel, I have been moved to the point I would cry or that I would keep reading again and again the sames pages because of the style of its writing (1); yet, if you like crime novels, you'll enjoy the Joe Pickett's series because it has both all the ingredients of the genre (a nice guy, some pretty deranged bad guys; humorous and touching secondary characters, lots of shooting and crushing skulls) and also some not so common ones, and these kind of ingredients (the ones that play with the genre boundaries: the family life; the scenery; the topics) are the ones that make C.J Box novels fun (2) and interesting to read. So, C.J, when are you done with the next one?
(1) I'm currently reading again La Vie devant Soi -The life before us- by Romain Gary/Ajar and yes, sometimes I'm so moved I cry...to be continued.
(2) I can't believe I used "fun"...such an American adjective... I should have said enjoyable, pleasant, entertaining, distracting...
Okay, I'm sold. Which one do you recommend for starters?
ReplyDeleteYou have to read them in their published order, since the characters evolve from one episode to the next. I think the first one is "Open Season".
ReplyDeleteI went to the library and got 4 different books by the guy. Spent a couple of days reading Blood Trail and decided that I would not read the other three. I am not sure I understand the French fascination with this guy's writings. I found them lacking in several ways. While the scenery gives an added dimension to the genre, as well the the topic (hunters and their foes), the plot was contrived and full of errors.
ReplyDeletePeople got killed too early before the reader could care about them, the main villain was totally wrong for the part, (not strong enough or free of other obligations to commit all the crimes), some people got a part without doing much to justify it, and the general sense was repeated too many time ("he felt someone was watching him..."). I will not mention all the errors and unnecessary murders that, while they were explained (who committed them) did not push the plot anywhere or were justified enough to take place. In short, the plot seemed like a hodgepodge of incidents put together and edited by several people who failed to notice instances of illogicality and discrepancies.
I started Nowhere to run and gave it up after a few pages. Too creepy for my taste.
Apologies to the fans and the French aficionados.
Yes, I agree with you Galia on the incoherence that I certainly overlooked out of sympathy for the main characters, but I don't have the feeling that his novels are particularly creepy. more average for the genre.
ReplyDeleteAnd, yes, we French certainly have a fascination for some of these westerns guys! (i.e the Hillerman's novels)